Order this book in paperback format directly from
the translator, Mr. Aime Ricci:
Fax: +1-602-283-5397 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Medicine of Hope,
Case # 1: LP
Auctioneer, age 49, male
Diagnosis: prostate cancer, osseous (bone)
metastases to the lumbar rachis (spine), the left
shoulder, and the lower right limb.
Patient operated for prostate adenocarcinoma
in January 1974. Receives 30 cobalt treatments. The pain is
intensifying. He asks me to give him a consultation at his residence at
night on several occasions to relieve him. And one night he begs me,
crying, to administer him a lethal dose to end it all with the disease.
He even offers to sign a document to protect me.
I reason with him, give him a sedative, and
the next day I call in front of him a good ten specialists and friendly
doctors to decide where to direct him. At that time, we felt lost, and
we still are... . Three of them suggest sending him to the Clinica Del
Mar in Tijuana, Mexico, where Dr. Contreras treats with the famous
laetrile. I manage rather well in Spanish. Dr. Contreras fixes an
appointment for him the following week. He thus leaves for Mexico and
returns two weeks later, a smile on his lips. All his pains have more
or less disappeared. I ask him kindly if Dr. Contreras is young or
old. "It is funny, he answers, I do not remember having met
him". What happened, is that at the travel agency, he met a
traveler who was going back to Mexico for the third year. He was going
to see his doctor for an annual follow up physical, and invited my
patient to go there with him.
This is how he turned up with him at Dr.
Donato Perez’s clinic in Mexico City, instead of going at Dr.
Contreras’s in Tijuana. In addition, this is how I have learned the
existence of this therapy in 1976.
"How many treatments did you
receive", I asked him? "A big one for a week followed by
five small ones, each day during two weeks." "It is surely
a new medical discovery" "It did me a great deal of good
and am going back to Mexico City in ten days to continue my
treatment!" "Very well," I said to him, "I am
going there with you."
Two weeks later, I catch a plane with him to
shed some light on this therapy, to discover this medicine and to know
who can this doctor or this discoverer be?
Case # 2: FL
Accountant, age 59, female
Diagnosis: terminal pulmonary neoplasia (cancer).
When my friend Jacques C, whom I had not seen
for ten years, asked me to come to examine his sister, down with a lung
cancer in final phase, I did not expect to find a patient in such a
pitiful state, so deteriorated.
A bad pneumonia in the summer, mislaid
X-rays, and five months later by another doctor, the fatal diagnosis
that does not forgive: a pulmonary cancer too close to the mediastinum
(area located between the two lungs) to be operable, with osseous
Only a few more weeks to live, 14 cobalt
treatments to be received (transport in ambulance to the Institute),
until someone finally tells the patient to please go home to die. "We
only treat those we can still treat". Then: "when
you are hurting too much, we will give you codeine, morphine or the
She was at this stage. Confined to bed
for five weeks, shriveled up on her illness and her fate, incapable
of swallowing, of drinking and speaking, she had become aphonic
(voiceless) by damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve. She was
suffering from atrocious pains to the whole lower right limb as
well as to the left upper limb. I had to lean very close to her to hear
what she murmured. She knew that she had not more than a few weeks to
live. She had been told. She was in a state of prostration, almost
stupor. She was only asking God to come and take her, and to me, to
help her not to suffer too much. She knew she was lost and it was
awfully sad to see her that way.
After a quick examination and a minimum of
essential questions, fearing to get her too tired, I explained to her
that I could not save her either. But if she accepted that I help
her with my therapy, I would soften the few days she had remaining to
live. She accepted. She had been taken by surprise. She had not had time
to see to her own affairs, she, who was holding a position of trust in
one of the largest financial companies of Quebec.
With a weak nod, she accepted our pact, shook
my hand with a poor smile and with the little bit of energy she still
had left. I had her transported the next morning in an ambulance, and I
took care of her the very same day.
Let us emphasize that while going through
Sainte-Agathe, I had her examined by two lung specialists of great
reputation, Dr. Agop Karagos and Dr. Albert Joannette of the Laurentien
Hospital who confirmed the sad diagnosis and the terrible forecast. It
was important for her and for me that she underwent this last
examination which was likely to be exhausting,
in the state she was in. We did it with many
regards and care. I was not able to save or cure this patient and I
had warned her. No therapy known in the world could have done it, at the
moment when I took her case. But there had been an extraordinary
improvement of her condition so much so, that on the third day, the
patient got up on her own, walked without assistance, had started again
to eat and had recovered her voice. Let us note that the third day her
pains had disappeared 85 or 90%, according to her own evaluation and
without morphine, codeine, not even aspirin. Soon she could walk
from her room to the dining room of the motel and take walks in the open
air a few minutes each day at her sister’s arm.
The seventeenth day, when I allowed her to
return home, she had gained a little more than three kilos (7
lb.), was eating well, and did not have any more pain to the
right leg nor to the left arm. Her voice had returned to normal.
With much softness, and not without a little heartache, I recommended to
her to make the most of these last days that heaven gave her, to live
them fully and to prepare consciously for the great departure...
. I would re-examine her in one week. The day of her discharge, I
received from Dr. Agop Karagos a call that I am not about to forget.
My patient had just arrived on her two
legs at the Laurentien hospital of Sainte-Agathe for a control
X-ray: the doctors were amazed by the results, the undeniable physical
improvement and the obvious reduction of the tumor confirmed by
radiography. There was no need to take measurements to notice the
reduction in the tumor.
It was at this time that Dr. Karagos made a
very judicious remark and rich of prediction for the lung specialist who
would like to benefit from it: "If ICT were routinely applied
in lung cancer cases, a lot of non-operable cases would become operable,
and, in any event, the operation would be done under much more favorable
conditions for the patient".
I re-examined the patient ten days later and
I gave her a second treatment, the last. Then I gave her final leave by
reassuring her the best I could... . She died a few weeks later. We used
morphine only in the last 30 hours of her disease. In gratitude, the
family created a fund for ICT research.
Can a doctor or a legislator remain
insensitive to the reading of such testimony?
Case # 3: MC (Nov. 1977)
Housewife, age 63
Diagnosis: osteo-sarcoma (bone cancer) of
the secondary sternum with choroidal melanoma (cancer
of the eye) and metastasis to the liver.
Patient operated for choroidal melanoma (malignant
retro-ocular tumor). Tumor enucleation right eye in Nov. 1970. Ablation
of the eyeball, in July 1971.
Six years later, in November 1977, metastases
to the liver and sternum are discovered. The family is informed that
the patient will probably not pass Christmas 1977. The patient
receives only the first of a series of treatments in nuclear medicine
and presents herself to my office, on November 28, 1977, choosing ICT, because
she has nothing to lose.
The treatments begin the very same day. In
the following 8 to 10 days, the pain to the liver disappears, nausea
ceases, circulation improves in a remarkable way, the osseous pains to
the hands, knees, shoulders disappear completely, as well as the
throbbing pains she had to the sternum. Her appetite returns, her morale
improves. The patient can take long walks, and walks to my office
without fatigue. On her day off (without treatment), Dec. 21, I tape the
patient with a video recorder. I take advantage of the opportunity, to
measure, in front of the camera, the sternal tumor that has decreased
from 5 x 5 cm to 3 x 3 cm in three weeks. On February 14, 1978,
after a new series of treatments, the state of the patient improves
further. On her day off, I inform her that she is not cured and that the
treatment was only palliative, in spite of obvious improvements.
In June 1978, the College inquires of the
family if there were improvements with my treatment and if the mass were
modified. The husband sends to me a copy of his response to the
College of the Doctors where he recognizes "my great frankness and
my honesty". He also recognizes that his wife suffers much less
than before, that the mass decreased but "since these treatments
were stopped, the volume of this mass has remained unchanged".
He asks the College the favor to grant me the permission to continue my
treatments to his wife, because currently, the only pains she feels are
to the liver and the ones to the thorax have almost disappeared.
why the College never followed up on his
On September 29, 1978, after one day and a
half of hospitalization and almost without pain, the patient passes away
very gently and remains conscious until the end. I received a touching
letter from the family thanking me for having softened and prolonged for
approximately nine months the last days of their patient.
Case # 4: M-AP
Housewife, age 39
Diagnosis: breast adeno-carcinoma.
For three years, the patient was having
mammograms with results that always proved negative. The third year, she
becomes impatient: "How is it that you do not find anything? I
have a small lump in my breast that is growing bigger and it is hurting.
Can't you do anything else?" "We can do a
biopsy." "But why didn’t you think of it sooner?"
The day after the biopsy, in August 1978, she
is called on the telephone in urgency. She has cancer. The breast must
be removed. She refuses. "You will not mutilate me".
Radiotherapy is suggested. She refuses. "You will not burn
me". After discussion, she accepts a bilateral ovariectomy
--whereas it was believed she had a hormone
dependent cancer--then a first treatment of chemotherapy. She is so
sick that she believes she is dying from it. Stoically, she accepts
death and refuses all other subsequent chemotherapy treatments.
Seven months later, April 5, 1979, she
comes to my office and supplicates me to treat her with ICT at least to
make the pain go away. She is aware that it is too late to save her. At
this time, the tumor measures 20 x 20 cm (that is to say 8 in. x
8 in.) by taking measurements on the vertical and the horizontal plane.
We also note the presence of 11 metastatic ganglia: 3 very
painful cervical, 6 supraclavicular (above the clavicle), and 2 axillary
(at the armpit) one of which measures 5 x 5 cm. ICT treatments begin
on April 5, 1979.
On June 29, 1979, from the eleven ganglia
noted on April 5, only one persists at the axillary fossa,
measuring 1 x 1 cm instead of 5-x 5 cm. The tumoral mass is decreased
to 7 x 7.5 cm from 20 x 20 cm as it was on April 5, 1979.
The patient having lost all her hair
following her single chemotherapy treatment in September, sees it
growing back and had to have it cut three times; she does not
need to wear a wig any more.
This patient died in November 1979. She had
to be hospitalized several weeks during the final phase. We can
affirm that ICT really relieved her sufferings. This is what she had
Extract from a written letter from her hand
to a benefactor whose name she did not even know, to whom I gave the
letter personally, and who had paid for her treatments: "I feel
spoiled, here in Haiti, but even if the doctor never promised 1%
of cure to me, I am very astonished to see that the three ganglia from
my neck, the six above the clavicle and both from the armpit, one of
which was larger than a plum, have completely disappeared. My
hair that had all fallen following my single chemotherapy treatment from
September grew back more than 4 cm in two months, and the cancerous mass
that I do have at my right breast, measured 20 cm (8 in.), and is now
only 7 cm (3 in.)... . I thank you from the bottom of my heart for
having helped an unknown person who is now most grateful to you.
Case # 5: IO
Restaurant keeper, age 53
Diagnosis: prostate adeno-carcinoma.
Patient with an adeno-carcinoma (cancer) of
the prostate, confirmed by two biopsies taken in a Montreal hospital.
After transurethral resection (through the
penis), a third biopsy is made a month and half later in another
hospital and confirms the persistence of cancer. Following complementary
examinations in another cancer clinic in Montreal, the patient refuses
radiotherapy. He chooses ICT and begins his treatment.
The following year, the patient returns to
see his specialists, the urologist and cancer specialist. Biopsies made
on this same patient in two different Montreal hospitals reveal the absence
of any cancerous tissues.
Contacted in December 1994, this patient
continues to enjoy excellent health after 15 years.
Case # 6: HPL
Electrical contractor, age 50, male
Diagnosis: pulmonary neoplasia.
After a fall off a ladder, X-rays reveal the
presence of two cancerous tumors in the left lung, confirmed by biopsy. "You
have only three months left to live."
He was referred to the nearest hospital that
confirms the diagnosis. The patient refuses conventional surgery,
radiotherapy and chemotherapy and decides to come to Haiti to be treated
Five weeks after his return, he goes back to
his family physician: negative X-rays. There is no more trace of the
two tumors. From there, he is sent to the hospital complex of
"X" where, during four years, he returns each month, then at 3
and 6 months interval and finally once a year. After 4 consecutive
years, someone tells him: "We are proud of the results we
have obtained! You are completely cured!"
And the patient: "How is that... you
have obtained?" "Well! You went to the clinic where we
referred you to?" "Never on my life! I was treated by Dr.
Paquette, in Haiti, with ICT". The only reply: "Tstt!
Tstt! Do not spread that!" That occurred in 1988. I have
the recordings on videocassette and audiotape.
Case # 7: FV
Housewife, age around 50
Diagnostic: inoperable stomach cancer.
This patient was never treated with ICT,
and you will see why. I could have entitled this article: "For
us, the size of the tumor, that's the only important thing!"
It is Saturday evening. Dr. Donato Perez of
Mexico City gets off the plane and has just entered my home at Lake
Gravel, when the telephone rings. It is a doctor, friend of one of the
most prominent families in Canada, who wants to send a helicopter to
fetch us, the same evening, Dr. Perez and me.
A family member, suffering from an inoperable
cancer, is hospitalized in one of the most important hospitals of
Montreal. They had brought from the United States "the most famous
oncologist" of North America. He cannot do anything and the family
wants to try everything to save her. They have heard about the Donatian
Cellular Therapy (ICT) and find him at my place.
Donato is exhausted. We know that we will
need several hours to study the case, examine the patient, evaluate her
correctly, consult the files, plan the treatment, gather all the
necessary material, including medications.
With great professionalism, Dr. Perez agrees
to be there the following Monday. He wants me to accompany him. It is
significant that we both make together the essential decisions. "You
are the pioneer of the Insulin-Cellular Therapy in Canada. You
are the only one to practice this therapy in the world with me. It
is then for you to apply it here, in Canada. I will be your
It was a stomach cancer case diagnosed five
months earlier at the same hospital, with a forecast of survival from 5
to 6 months. As there was no question of surgery, the patient had
received four series of conventional chemotherapy treatment. The
attending physician recommended the stopping of any ultra-specialized
treatment, i.e. radiotherapy or chemotherapy. September 16, in the
imposing file of the patient (12 inches... !), we could read: "It
is obvious here that we are beyond any chance of cure and even of
palliation. There is no indication for total parenteral nourishment. It
would be here a case of ‘over-treatment’. In addition, the
patient is not currently suffering". We understand it well, Dr.
Perez and I: It is because of the morphine in very high dose and the
And further: "I think that it is
necessary to leave her the choice to end her days her own way and the
most comfortably possible". We would have really liked to help
this patient and we believed we could. She was pathetic to look at. Her
sympathetic expression reflected much kindness. She had already
passively accepted death that was awaiting her.
We have respected the state of intense
asthenia (weakness) in which she was because of her disease, of course,
but also because of chemotherapy, morphine, and other sedatives.
We made the questionnaire in a fashion
neither to excessively tire her nor to importune her. We noted an
advanced state of intoxication, which manifested itself by a
hypertrophied liver, obvious circulatory problems, a significant edema
especially on the left arm, ascites, acrocyanosis (cold extremities),
paleness, icteric complexion (yellow), palpitations, intense dyspnea
(breathlessness), an accelerated pulse, and extreme asthenia.
In spite of this lugubrious picture, in which
Insulin-Cellular Therapy excels, we were both convinced, from our
respective experiences that we could still help her, i.e. to improve her
general condition, to eliminate her pains without narcotics, to decrease
her dyspnea, her edema, (NB: see migraines and cephalgias, case #
10) and when the time would come, to allow her a softer death, more
dignified, more human, more conscious. She was ready to accept the
treatment that we were offering her, to improve her condition, and to
relieve her suffering, but by respect for the "famous"
oncologist that the family had summoned especially and as she said,
"who had been so good for her", she did not want to accept
without his approval. We knew very well that it was too late to save
I kept in the file the message from hospital
X. "For the Mexican Dr.: Dr. Z will not be able to see you
today, but tomorrow between 10:00 and 11:00 hours", a cavalier
way to give himself some importance and to display, right off the start,
his prejudices, in spite of the extreme urgency of the case.
We awaited the honor of the talk the next
morning. Without the courtesy of a glance, Dr. Z received us in a very
haughty and not very courteous way.
We were dumbfounded. Unshakable, he did not
want to listen to what we were saying to him, Dr. Perez and me,
impolitely pressing us to finish as fast as possible in order to
return his verdict of "master of thought" without even having
Casting a furtive glance at the therapy chart
prepared by Dr. Perez and myself, and of which he did not understand
anything, he asked us why we were not using a chemotherapy
medication he himself knew? We hardly had enough time to explain to him
that this was exactly the guiding principle of our therapy. To
use in synergy (two or more medications working together to obtain a
better result) several medications at the same time in reduced doses, thanks
to insulin to tackle the organism from all sides. According to
his oncologist training, he said, and according to his experience, only
the volume of the tumor imported and not the improvement of the general
condition of the patient.
He would have liked that we use only one
anti-neoplasia (anti cancer drug) for any treatment. We felt unable to
reduce the medication to two or three drugs just to please him and try
to obtain the same results we expected and knew. We did not want to
experiment on this patient, but to have her benefit from our experience.
Dr. Perez then asked Dr. Z if he were
conscious of his patient’s state of intoxication, and why,
knowing it, he had continued to give her chemotherapy, morphine, and
cortisone in such high doses? This annoying question received only
the rough outline of an evasive answer.
The oncologist asked Dr. Perez how he
evaluated the results of the treatment. This last answered: "by
a new physical examination, the questionnaire, the reduction or
improvement of the symptoms, in all fields: digestive, circulatory,
respiratory, genito-urinary, nervous, by reduction and palpation of the
tumor if necessary, by evaluation of the pain, by laboratory tests, and
by X-rays such as medicine teaches it."
The famous oncologist not wanting to be
informed of anything declared solemnly, as a master of thought: "That
does not have any value for us. We do not treat in this fashion. It is
impossible to believe that the tumor can decrease so much. It is not
sufficient to give a value judgment to this kind of treatment."
(See cancer, cases # 2, 3,
4 & 6)
This was the end of the meeting. He concluded
saying: "Any way I will not interfere with you",
which meant: I will not oppose your treatment.
On the other hand... we were informed the
next day that the patient would not receive the treatment, not wanting
to displease her oncologist and feeling that she was trapped in the
Case # 8: SL-C
Housewife, age 48
Diagnosis: colon cancer.
Patient hospitalized at the hospital of
Hanover, NH, USA. Operated for a cancer: intestinal resection of 20 in.
(50 cm) and colostomy (artificial anus). She has lost 55 lb. (25 kg) and
the doctors tell her she has only 5 to 6 months to live.
Her husband, a forest contractor, does not
accept the verdict either. In Miami, they heard about my clinic and come
to consult me in Haiti. I admit her.
After 4 years, she has regained her
initial weight; she is a picture of health. All her tests are
negative. I send her to her surgeon she has not seen since her
operation. He makes her undergo the most thorough tests of the hour and
declares to her: "Simone, you are completely cured, but I am
not the one who has cured you, it is your doctor in Haiti".
He hospitalizes her, "undo her
colostomy", re-anastomosis (reconnects) her intestine. I have
re-examined the patient after 9 years, in 1993. She is very happy and
thanks God for having directed her to me. In spite of these
extraordinary results, I do not claim to have cured her, if only
clinically. No doctor cures anything; we are only instruments in God’s
hands, let us not forget it.
Case # 9: FG
Cashier, age 23
Diagnosis: vulvar cancer, metastatic ganglionic cancer.
The doctors predict she has 6 months to live.
Treated from the very start with ICT in Haiti. Back home,
ganglionic biopsies in two significant hospitals of Montreal that
confirm later to her that there is no remaining cancer. Patient still in
excellent health in 1995, almost 17 years after the only treatments she
received in Haiti.
DECIDED TO TREAT THESE CASES
Let us take a last panoramic look at these
few cases I have just briefly presented to you. I chose them in various
categories of diseases in order to make you understand the plurality
of action of this therapy. An honest mind is obliged to recognize
An undeniable fact is obvious: all these
patients presented rebellious chronic problems for which they had
consulted many doctors and specialists, in our famous hospitals and
No patient was satisfied with the results
obtained or was not sufficiently relieved of his troubles, since they
had recourse to me. In ICT, I dealt with the cases that medicine
abandons or neglects and leaves to their fate. I wanted to help them
because it is the only reason to exist for a doctor and I always
wanted to be a true doctor.
I tried by all means to help my patients
through the new knowledge I had acquired and that I have always sought
to widen and to deepen. I can declare that I have never applied a
treatment without having the certainty, at least moral, to be able
to help a patient, to obtain positive results bearing on my medical
knowledge, my experience, and the knowledge of real cases.
These treatments have never endangered the
life of anyone. Many die in hospitals following often-debatable
treatments, seldom discussed, and which remain generally veiled.
Many patients cannot tolerate even benign surgical interventions
and it costs them their lives. Many also remain "mortgaged"
for the remainder of their days. Scientific honesty should incite us
to recognize the veracity of this observation.
Divide these numbers by ten for
EXTRACT OF THE BULLETIN OF
THE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE OF QUEBEC
ON FEBRUARY 1, 1979
"Nearly 2 million unnecessary surgical
interventions were performed in 1977 in the United States, costing the
community some 4 billion dollars and causing the death of more than
10,000 patients", reports a special sub-committee of the House of
Representatives in Washington, DC (AFP).
a) All the cases cited are chronic, except the two cases
of viral hepatitis.
b) The treatments were accepted freely and willingly,
knowing that nothing was promised. We guarantee nothing, any more
than we can do it in conventional medicine.
The patients had nothing to lose, no risk to be taken, and in
any event, there was no more hope in most of the cases.
c) No cases were declared cured if not clinically, and the
patients know it, even if for some patients it has been 18 years with no
more sign of the disease.
We always remain a candidate for the same disease, because of
our familial diatheses (predisposition toward diseases), our lifestyle,
our past, our general condition, our nutrition habits, our way of
thinking, or our lack of will power. Many patients have never
suffered again and have been able to resume their activities. Isn’t
this the first goal of medicine?
d) The improvement has not only been very rapid, sometimes
on the order of 24 hours, but it lasted as long as the patient
has not fallen back into the same mistakes (lifestyle, nutrition
regimen, psychological state of mind) that can provoke the same
e) The improvement manifested itself in a tangible manner in every
• By control examinations:
questionnaire and observations that I call "profiles" of 24,
48 hours, 1, 2 weeks, etc.
• By the partial or complete
disappearance of subjective or objective symptoms particular to each
• By laboratory tests, radiographies (X-rays),
and if needed, consultations.
f) An interesting fact attracts our attention: when we have
administered these treatments we have noted:
intolerance, no toxicity,
idiosyncrasies (reaction peculiar to each individual),
anaphylaxis (increase of personal sensitivity),
iatrogenic effect (medicine induced disease).
AND THIS IN SPITE OF:
of medications used at the same time in a few minutes and synergy (i.e.
a drug potentiating the other). There were usually from 25 to 30
different medications used in only one treatment.
fact that in cases of asthma and allergies, almost all suffered from
multiple allergies. One patient was allergic to 589 drugs (see
respiratory diseases, case # 23).
g) The elimination of the side effects brought by medications
used before and/or during the ICT treatments such as: gold salts,
cortisone, conventional codeine, anti-inflammatory drugs, chemotherapy,
h) The treatments are absolutely not traumatic compared to
surgery, neurosurgery, radiation therapy, conventional chemotherapy, and
general anesthesia. This is in fact, for who wants it, a gentle
There are excessively dangerous and delicate operations that
sometimes endanger the patient’s life and that, often, do not
even clear the problems. Surgeons are conscious of it.
Honestly, they hesitate sometimes at great length before deciding to
intervene by fear of irreversible after-effects or even of death during
i) We were able to apply ICT to patients who already had
infarctions and ischemia lesions or had undergone an aortic bypass,
without endangering their life, which proves
the great safety margin within which we are working. (See
circulatory diseases case # 4: with this patient, we were able to cancel
his cardiac surgery. Also see circulatory diseases, case # 6).
I applied it to a five-year-old child, as well as to an
87-year-old man, my father, Albiny Paquette, doctor himself and
former Minister of Health of Quebec. He was aware of and agreed with
this form of medicine.
j) There was undeniable improvement in desperate cases and in
cases where specialized medicine had failed, had acknowledged
helplessness, or had resigned. (See neurological diseases, case # 2,
and cancer, case # 1).
k) In the cases of cephalgias or migraines, the pain has
disappeared without aspirin, codeine, and morphine.
l) Is it not eminently surprising to have been able to cure or
make disappear completely surgical problems with purely medical
treatments of ICT?
5 cases of slipped discs, (see neurological diseases cases # 3,
7 & 8).
2 cases of endarteritis, (see circulatory diseases cases # 1 and
1 case of hemorrhoidal mass, (see circulatory diseases case # 3).
Dr. Michael Lévi, fellow in surgery, did not hide his admiration of
us for this last case.
We obtained a clinical correction in five cases of slipped disc, one
of which was my own. It is difficult to believe that the abnormal
mechanics and related neuro-mechanics could be corrected, whereas they
should normally have continued to impose constraints on the discs. The
facts are there! I ask those who can enlighten me to come up with a
m) Thanks to the improvement of blood circulation, ICT’s
"force de frappe," we frequently note the disappearance of
acrocyanosis (cold extremities), dizzy spells, cephalgias (cerebral
circulation), numbness, muscular cramps, intermittent limping
(peripheral circulation), precordialgias (coronary or cardiac
circulation), the disappearance of cardio-renal edema, the return to
normal of hypertension (see circulatory diseases, case # 2).
It is not rare to note a more colored skin, less greasy or less
dry, a better complexion, a less yellow cornea, the disappearance of
acne, a re-growth of superficial body growths (hair, nails, etc.), hair
less dry or less greasy depending on the case, a tendency to a better
cicatrization, and for old scars to become less apparent than before the
One notes on occasion, a recrudescence (revival) of sexual
n) These patients’ mental attitude improved notably
because they were not getting the side effects of the medications they
were not obliged to take anymore. They ceased suffering, they ceased to
be dependent on these medications, the atomizers, oxygen, respiratory
therapy, vaccines, injections, ambulances, hasty races to emergency
rooms, the distressing waiting hours, appointments made and postponed. How
many had lost all hope? They have been defocused from their disease.
o) ICT allows a saving of time and money by eliminating the
increasingly expensive drugs with often harmful and dangerous side
effects, the consultations and the hospitalizations, even if they are
covered by their health insurance.
NB: There are exceptions. A new drug for prostate cancer
costs only the moderate sum of approximately $350,00 per injection... ,
still without knowing either its immediate effects, or its side effects
in the long run... .
Several did not have to quit their employment because of poor health
or were able to return to work. Some took up again tennis,
skiing, swimming, etc.
Their organism realized energy saving to fight the side effects
of the medications used until then. All that represents for the
patients, year in year out, a small fortune, and an impressing medical
p) Cutaneous and respiratory allergies:
The tests for allergies obviously brought precision to the
etiologic diagnosis. As for the therapeutic value of the vaccines,
it could be questioned because, in the cases presented, all the patients
who received them consulted (with me) precisely because they had not
obtained the desired improvement. In every case, no more vaccine has
ever been necessary. These tests represent an unbelievable waste of
time and money.
q) Some conditions associated with the principal diagnoses
were treated at the same time by this therapy, which benefits
from the therapeutic moment to treat simultaneously the whole organism
at once. It is another strength of this therapy.
r) It is not a miracle treatment, far from it. There were
relapses in certain cases. Some did not respond in a satisfactory manner
to the treatment.
No one reacts in the same way to a medication or to a treatment. Some
cancer cases that were too advanced came too late to consult me; it was
There are some imponderables. There are, above all, cheating patients
who do not do what we are recommending to them, and who do not dare to
Several did not receive a sufficient number of treatments to
control perfectly, and in so little time, the conditions they took years
to develop, but they were all improved.
s) Patients left the clinic with a regimen of life to be
followed, a balanced and hypo-toxic diet to which we initiated
them, and with very few medications to be taken.
A lady from Montreal, who was taking 41 tablets per day before the
cure, has reduced her daily dose to 3 per day. She is in excellent
In every health question, the participation of the patient,
the most interested party, is essential. When the doctor finishes his
act, it is up to the patient to really start playing his.
t) Multiple sclerosis: (see neurological diseases, case # 1, page
The results also make you think. If there were only one case of
success out of a thousand, it would still be worth the effort to try and
at least to consider it! This case of multiple sclerosis that I have
treated successfully was a world first.
u) Hemiplegia resulting from a cerebral hemorrhage.
It is again the doctor’s sixth sense that inspired me to
try a treatment where all the odds seemed against me. I had the feeling
in advance that it was going to work! (See neurological diseases, cases
# 2, 6 &
v) Case of AIDS.
I have treated in Haiti a case of AIDS that a religious sect from the
United States had sent me. I prolonged my stay in Haiti to treat him
The diagnosis was confirmed to me by telephone by his Boston
hospital. Three months later, someone said to my patient that it was
probably a case of pre-AIDS, and that he had no more... .
This answer demoralized me, perhaps wrongly... . I have refused to
treat other cases.
HOW ABOUT THE CURE?
the world, no doctor, homeopath, acupuncturist, masseur, therapist,
chiropractor, osteopath, healer, or other, cures anything.
The human being, with his 60,000 billion
cells, possesses within him the vital energy, this divine breath
that governs life on earth and sees to the harmonious function of all
the cells of the human body.
When the harmony is disturbed, this is when
the problems appear, the diseases.
We who are treating, are here only to help
the patient to take charge of himself, to make him become aware, to show
him the path to follow, and provide him the instruments he needs to find
the balance, health.
The doctor who sutures a wound, the surgeon
who makes a laparatomy, they see a cut, an abdomen heal up again. They
witness, quite powerless, the marvelous work of nature.
We are only instruments between the hands of
God. We are only quite pretentious pawns on the great chessboard of
When a patient is cured (clinically), it is
not by us, but through us.
It is like the magnifying glass with which we
can light a fire. It is not the lens who sets the fire, but the solar
energy, which passes through it and whose rays it makes converge.
< Continue to part 10 >